From today’s Jersey Journal
Fulop, Richardson are lonely yes votes; pay-to-play ban fails
Friday, January 26, 2007By KEN THORBOURNE
JOURNAL STAFF WRITER
Over the hoots and jeers of the audience in the council chambers, the Jersey City City Council shot down a developer pay-to-play ban proposed by Councilman Steve Fulop.
“Jersey City would still be a railroad yard” if it weren’t for developers, said Ward A Councilman Michael Sottolano, one of six council members to vote against the ban.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Before casting his “nay” vote, Councilman-at-large Peter Brennan defended the integrity of Hudson County and his colleagues.
“We’re from Hudson County . and people bring up the word ‘C,’ corruption,” Brennan said. “I believe we are all honest and not corrupt politicians.”
The proposal would have barred campaign donations from a developer to municipal officials while the developer is negotiating with city officials to be named the “designated” builder for a project.
According to the Citizens’ Campaign, the group that worked with Fulop to draft the measure, 14 other municipalities have adopted this ban. Jersey City is the first municipality to reject it at a first reading.
Joining Sottolano and Brennan in voting against the proposal were Bill Gaughan, Mary Spinello, Willie Flood and Steve Lipski. City Council President Mariano Vega abstained, and Ward F Councilwoman Viola Richardson was the sole council colleague to vote with Fulop.
Dozens of supporters of the measure crammed the council chambers, many of toting signs displaying a photocopy of a front page of The Jersey Journal showing Fulop on one side, and “Stop Pay to Play” printed on the other.
At various points in the meeting, audience members booed and hissed.
“You work for us,” one man barked at Brennan. Another man yelled “It’s over,” an apparent threat to boot from office those who voted against the ban.
Jersey City Mayor Jerramiah Healy opposed the measure on the grounds it would deprive developers of their right to give money to who they want, when they want.
A downcast Fulop said after the vote that he and other supporters of the measure might try to get in on the ballot through a public referendum, which would involve collecting enough signatures of registered voters to qualify.
“I think the public sees it for what it is,” Fulop said about the vote. “They (the council members) can either be part of change or get overrun by it.”